Conducting Helpful Conferences

This handout provides tips for conferencing with students in a way that reinforces student-centered pedagogy. If we teach that writing is a self-empowering process in our classrooms, it is incumbent upon us to model the same philosophy in our offices. This approach to "office hours" presents several challenges, most of which are related to time constraints and the power differential between the student and teacher.

An effective conference is not simply a conversation about the student's writing, even if it sometimes can feel that way; instead, a good conference involves setting a clear goal, enacting specific strategies for meeting that goal, and mapping out an action plan for what the student will do when he or she leaves the office. A student should be doing the majority of the work on his or her writing during the conference.

Different types of conferences demand different demeanors and different strategies. Certainly, a conference with a student whom we suspect of plagiarism will differ markedly from a conference with a student who is dropping by for a little thesis statement help. In this handout, I do not attempt to address special situations such as conferencing about academic dishonesty or a contested grade. Instead, this handout should help you help a student with his or her writing, whether the student drops by during office hours by his or her own volition, attends a 15 minute session that is required of all students, or comes into the office at your request.

Acting as a facilitator during a conference can be difficult. First of all, there is a limited amount of time. Given this, it can be tempting to forego process pedagogy and focus instead on the product; it takes more time to lead the student to an answer than it does to provide the answer yourself. Second, telling the student the solution to a writing problem is easy. The student is struggling, and needs answers, and you most likely have them. Resist the urge to become the Teacher with a capital "T." It's possible to undermine what we have accomplished in the classroom by taking too much control over the paper's direction, making comments that damage self-confidence, or overwhelming the student with suggestions.

Before the conference:

Beginning of the conference:

During the conference:

a. What do you think now that you hear the paper aloud/read the paper again?

b. What's your favorite part of the draft? What part do you think needs work?

c. How has your draft changed?

d. What did you learn about your writing by hearing it aloud?

e. What are you trying to say in this paper? What is it about? What's your argument?

At the end of the conference: